USPTO serial 79314977
CHARGEPAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CANTOR, JILLIAN REDDING
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHARGEPAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle P. Ciotola
Michelle P. Ciotola Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church StreetFloor 22Hartford, CT 06103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for payment processing; electronic payment terminal; Downloadable computer software for e-payment via internet or mobile device; Downloadable computer software for online payment processing; Downloadable computer software for e-commerce and e-payment for arranging online transactions and facilitating secure credit card transactions; computer hardware for facilitating payment transactions by electronic means; Downloadable computer software for facilitating payment transactions by electronic means; Downloadable software for processing electronic payments to and from others | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 036 | Payment processing services in the field of credit card, debit card, and prepaid card payments; automated bill payment services provided via website and mobile applications; Electronic payment services involving electronic processing and subsequent transmission of bill payment data; payment administration services; remote payment services namely, remote processing of credit card, debit, check and ACH payment; financial payment services namely, credit card payment processing services; bill payment services; contactless payment services namely, credit card, debit card, gift card and promotional card transaction processing services; conducting cashless payment transactions namely, processing electronic payments via a global computer network; electronic commerce payment services namely, establishing funded accounts used to purchase goods and services on the Internet; electronic wallet payment services, namely, processing of electronic wallet payments, bill payment services provided via an electronic wallet; electronic processing of payments namely, electronic credit card transaction processing; Providing electronic processing of credit card transactions and electronic payments via a global computer network | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for processing electronic payments | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2024 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 13, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 11, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 10, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 24, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 22, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 22, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 13, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |