Drawing for LYNX

USPTO serial 79314995

LYNX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LIU, PHILIP HUAI-EN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LYNX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Molly Mack Crandall

Molly Mack Crandall BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C.150 W. Second St., Suite 400NRoyal Oak, MI 48067-3846United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Industrial ethernet switches for operational technologyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 22, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 25, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 25, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 24, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 26, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 27, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 16, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 16, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 2, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 3, 2023OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 14, 2022OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 14, 2022OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 24, 2022GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2022GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2022CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 23, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 22, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 22, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 14, 2022RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 25, 2022RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 25, 2022RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 4, 2022RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 3, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 13, 2021MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 9, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 8, 2021REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance