USPTO serial 79315186
WSL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CIANCI, RYAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WSL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
YIU F AU
YIU F AU AU LAW OFFICE, P.C.333 S GRAND AVESTE 3310LOS ANGELES, CA 90071Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Internet protocol broadcasting; Video on-demand transmission services of gaming content; wireless broadcasting; providing streaming services of movies, music, videos, and gaming videos; electronic data transmission of movies, music, video, gaming videos and multimedia content; internet broadcasting specializing in on-line games; television broadcasting specializing in on-line games; internet broadcasting services; electronic data transmission of videos, movies, pictures, images, text, photos, user-generated audio and video ontent, audio content, and information therefor via the Internet | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 2, 2024 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 2, 2024 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 2, 2024 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 2, 2024 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 3, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2022 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 14, 2022 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2022 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Oct 3, 2022 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 5, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 7, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 17, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 16, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |