USPTO serial 79315328
BETTYS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CIANCI, RYAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BETTYS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Erica B. E. Rogers
Erica B. E. Rogers Ward and Smith, P.A.751 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 300Post Office Box 33009Raleigh, NC 27636-3009Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Dried fruits; frosted fruits; crystallized fruits; nuts prepared or processed; dried dates; fruit peel; fruit jellies spreads; fruit preserved in alcohol; jams; marmalades; fruit preserves | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Bread; rolls; baguettes; muffins; crumpets; cakes; stollen; cookies; gateaux; biscuits; tea breads; scones; tea cakes; danish pastries; croissants; brioche; fruit pies; sweet tarts; Christmas cakes; birthday cakes; wedding cakes; meringues; buns; fondants; pastries; puddings; celebration cakes; Christmas puddings; chocolate; chocolates; pralines; tea; coffee; drinking chocolate; coffee extracts; coffee essences; mixtures of coffee and chicory; chicory and chicory mixtures, all for use as substitutes for coffee; chutneys; chocolate truffles; all of the aforementioned not including any goods in the form of food mix products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 28, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 22, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 17, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 29, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 14, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 19, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 5, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 4, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 3, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 12, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2022 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 22, 2022 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 12, 2022 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 8, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 7, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2021 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2021 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |