USPTO serial 79315438
ODP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ODP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Digital signal processors; large-screen liquid crystal displays [LCDs]; graphics processor units [GPUs]; video processors; data processing apparatus; computer software, recorded; central processing units for processing information, data, sound and images; central processing units [processors]; humanoid robots with artificial intelligence; computer software platforms, recorded or downloadable; computer hardware; tablet computers; laptop computers; smartwatches; smartphones; camcorders; cameras [photography]; audio interfaces; audio- and video-receivers; sensors; chips [integrated circuits]; liquid crystal display [LCD] screens; virtual reality headsets; cables for the transmission of sounds and images; connectors [electricity]; inverters [electricity]; accumulators, electric; video screens; television apparatus; organic light-emitting diode [OLED] display panels; digital signal display panels | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technological research; research and development of new products for others; scientific research; conducting technical project studies; telecommunications technology consultancy; computer programming; computer software design; updating of computer software; consultancy in the design and development of computer hardware; maintenance of computer software; recovery of computer data; conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; computer system design; creating and maintaining web sites for others; conversion of computer programs and data, other than physical conversion; computer software consultancy; rental of web servers; providing search engines for the internet; website design consultancy; information technology [IT] consultancy; electronic data storage; providing information relating to computer technology and programming via a website; cloud computing; computer technology consultancy; computer security consultancy; developing of driver and operating system software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 11, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 10, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |