USPTO serial 79315516
STROHM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GADSON, SHARI B.
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STROHM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brent E. Routman
Brent E. Routman Merchant & Gould150 South 5th Street, Suite 2200P.O. Box 2910Minneapolis, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Flexible pipes, not of metal; Flexible pipe and pipe systems comprised primarily of tubes, hoses, valves and fittings therefor, the pipes being all non-metal and made of plastic and fibres; Fibre reinforced thermoplastic flexible pipes for conveying natural gas; Nonmetallic flexible pipe and pipeline products, namely, tubes, hoses, valves and fittings therefor made of plastic and fibers for use in the oil and gas and renewable energy industries, namely, for use as flowlines, risers, jumpers, downlines, and hoses for chemical injection, methanol and glycol (MEG) injection, hydrocarbon production, gas lift, water injection, hydrogen transfer and concrete pumping, all the aforesaid goods not of metal; Non-metallic, flexible thermoplastic composite pipes for use in the oil and gas industry for water injection, chemical injection as well as methanol and glycol (MEG) injection; Non-metallic, flexible thermoplastic composite pipes for use in intervention of wells, namely, for use in chemical injection; Non-metallic, flexible thermoplastic composite pipes for conveying fluids, namely, mixtures, slurries of concrete, mineral, sand or nodule slurries, gas for transport or for storage, and power and data transmission functions; Non-metallic fittings, namely, permeation barrier sheets and foils for use within flexible pipes; Pipe insulation in the nature of insulation layers and weight layers for use within flexible pipes; non-metal fittings in the nature of ancillary components for flexible pipes, namely, spare structural parts of flexible pipes, namely anodes, ballast elements for lighting, non-metal friction clamps, buoyancy support elements, bend restrictors and bend stiffeners, all for flexible pipes; all of the above goods for use in the field of oil and gas infrastructure or thermoplastic composite pipes | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Rigid pipes and rigid and flexible ducts, not primarily made of metal, for mining, extracting and transporting mineral materials; Rigid pipes and rigid and flexible ducts, not primarily made of metal, for transporting concrete, cement and gravel | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Product design and development of design methodologies in the field of thermoplastic composite pipe and its ancillaries; Scientific laboratory work services; Engineering services, namely, installation, renovation, maintenance, repair and modernization of pipeline infrastructures; Engineering for design and development of production equipment and processes in the field of oil and gas and hydrogen pipeline infrastructure; Custom design and engineering in the nature of engineering design applied to outfitting and manufacturing equipment in the field of oil and gas and hydrogen pipeline infrastructure; Continental and subsea engineering and installation and in-place analysis in the field of continental and subsea oil and gas and renewable energy infrastructure; Research and development of new processes and products for production of thermoplastic composite pipes; Research and development of new processes and products for others; Provision of technical studies of new processes and products for others in the field of oil and gas and hydrogen pipeline infrastructure being feasibility studies in the field of new technologies; Technical project study in the field of oil and gas and hydrogen pipeline infrastructure being feasibility studies in the field of new technologies; Research in the field of environmental protection; Technical research in the field of oil and gas and hydrogen pipeline infrastructure; Recovery of computer data; Hosting of servers; Subsea engineering and installation in the field of subsea oil and gas and renewable energy infrastructure | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 21, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 21, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 21, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2022 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 29, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 24, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 22, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |