USPTO serial 79315549
NORTHERN JEWELRY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARMON, RAYMOND E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NORTHERN JEWELRY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Greger
Jeffrey H. Greger Hauptman Ham, LLP2318 MILL RD.SUITE 1400Alexandria, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Jewellery; jewellery boxes; key rings and key chains, and charms therefor; necklaces; silver necklaces; gold necklaces; gold-plated necklaces; silver-plated necklaces; earrings; clip earrings; gold earrings; silver earrings; jewelry; jewelry, namely, rings; jewelry, namely, pins; jewelry boxes; bracelets; jewelry, namely, bracelets; bead bracelets; silver bracelets; gold plated bracelets; silver-plated bracelets; hat jewelry; leather jewelry boxes; tie bars; tie bars of precious metals; tie clips; tie clips of precious metal; cuff links and tie clips; cufflinks; boxes for cufflinks; key rings; key chains; jewelry charms; jewellery chains of precious metals; tie chains of precious metal; key chains of precious metal; ornamental lapel pins; lapel pins; lapel pins of precious metals; jewellery cases; jewellery of precious metals; jewelry chains; All the foregoing excluding watches and watch accessories and horological instruments | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring clothing and clothing accessories; retail store services in the field of clothing; wholesale store services in relation to clothing; wholesale store services in relation to jewellery; retail store services in relation to bags; retail store services in relation to luggage; mail order retail services for clothing accessories; All the foregoing services excluding and not featuring or relating to watches or watch accessories and horological instruments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2024 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 31, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 30, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2022 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2022 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2022 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 12, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 12, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 8, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 24, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 23, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |