USPTO serial 79315867
ATOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGH, TEJBIR
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ATOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert P. Felber, Jr.
Robert P. Felber, Jr. Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis, LLP511 Union StreetSuite 2700Nashville, TN 37219Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | augmented reality helmets, namely, augmented reality headsets: augmented reality computer hardware; head mounted augmented reality displays | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | building construction consultancy; building construction advisory services; building construction supervision services for building projects; providing online information relating to building construction; advisory services relating to building construction; providing information relating to building construction; building inspection in the course of building construction; consultation in building construction supervision; consultancy relating to residential and building construction; information services relating to the construction of buildings; consultancy services relating to the construction of buildings; rental of apparatus for use in the construction of buildings; on site project management relating to the construction of buildings; providing information relating to the construction, repair and maintenance of buildings; advisory services relating to the construction of buildings and other structures | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | application service provider (ASP), namely, hosting computer software applications of others; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for creating augmented reality images; rental of computer application software for creating augmented reality images of structures at construction sites; software as a service (SAAS) services for providing temporary use of non-downloadable virtual and augmented reality software for generating images of structures at construction sites via a website | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 21, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 14, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 7, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 6, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |