Drawing for SENSIVE

USPTO serial 79317328

SENSIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROTH, BENJAMIN H.
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SENSIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arlene D. Hanks

Arlene D. Hanks Moore & Van Allen PLLC100 N. Tryon Street, Suite 4700Charlotte, NC 28202-4003UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Recorded computer software for use with biomedical imaging apparatus; testing apparatus not for medical purposes, namely, ultrasound imaging apparatusSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
035Electronic processing of health care informationSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
044Medical imaging services; medical testing for diagnostic or treatment purposes; medical testing for fitness evaluation; medical testing services relating to the diagnosis and treatment of disease; medical diagnostic services, namely, remote monitoring of medical data for medical diagnosis and treatmentSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 21, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 2, 2023GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2023GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2023CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 1, 2023RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 31, 2023OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 13, 2023RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 11, 2023OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2023OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 17, 2022RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 18, 2022GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 18, 2022GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 18, 2022CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 8, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 4, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 4, 2021RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 15, 2021RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 15, 2021RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 31, 2021RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 30, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2021MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 8, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 8, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2021REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance