Drawing for FIBROC

USPTO serial 79317725

FIBROC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STURMAN,MELISSA M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIBROC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michelle P. Ciotola

Michelle P. Ciotola Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church StreetFloor 22Hartford, CT 06103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Non-metallic building materials, namely, non-woven textiles made of synthetic fibres for use in the building industry; building paper, namely, paper board for building; fibre materials for building purposes, namely, structural and architectural members formed of pressed wood fibers; fiber reinforced plastic construction materials, namely, multilayer panels of plastic for use in building; non-woven textiles made of synthetic fibers for use in the building industry; non-woven textiles made of synthetic fibers for the use in flooring, ceilings, plasterboard applications; non-metallic reinforcing materials for building and construction, namely, reinforcing materials not of metal for building purposes; all aforementioned goods for further industrial processing for the manufacture of fiber-based finished goods; all aforementioned goods not in connection with bricks, brick material or other ceramic materialACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 1, 2026ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 21, 2023IRRHIRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU—
Nov 1, 2023IRFIIRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 13, 2023FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 13, 2023FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 8, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2023OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 18, 2023OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 18, 2023OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 21, 2022FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 13, 2022MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Oct 13, 2022ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 12, 2022EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2022GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 12, 2022GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 12, 2022GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 12, 2022CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 8, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2022LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW—
Feb 28, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 23, 2022DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 16, 2022AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 11, 2022DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2022ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Dec 25, 2021LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 27, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 12, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2021ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Nov 12, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 12, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2021RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 31, 2021RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 31, 2021RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 20, 2021RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 20, 2021MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 19, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 16, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2021REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance