USPTO serial 79317974
BIEHLER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALESKOW, DAVID HOWARD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIEHLER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael Soderman
Spechtstr. 9Falkensee, 14612GERMANYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Luggage, bags in the nature of shoulder bags, cycling bags, waterproof bags, cases, hip bags, weekender, hand bag, pouch, satchel, travelling bags, wallets and all-purpose carrying bags; umbrellas and parasols; bags for sports clothing; bags for sports; sports packs; cross-body bags | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, t-shirts, jackets, hoodies, outer wear, long sleeves, sweat shirts, shorts, trousers, blouses, t-shirts, shirts, vests, jackets, windbreaker, baselayers, longsleeves, jerseys; headwear, namely, hats, caps, beanies, headbands; parts of clothing, footwear and headgear, namely, shoe soles, finished textile linings for garments; footwear; sportswear, namely, athletic shorts, athletic shirts, athletic tights, athletic jackets, athletic vests, tracksuit, athletic long sleeves, cycling bib shorts, cycling tights, cycling jerseys, cycling jackets, cycling gilets, fitness shirts, fitness tights and shorts, yoga clothing, clothing for running including shirts, tights, shorts, jackets, tennis wear, hockey wear; athletic tights; moisture-wicking sports pants; moisture-wicking sports shirts; clothing, namely, padded pants for athletic use; jackets being sports clothing; sports headwear other than helmets, namely, hats, caps, beanies, headbands; sports pants; sports jackets; sports caps and hats; sports socks; sports jerseys; sports jerseys and breeches for sports; sports singlets; athletics vests; tee-shirts; caps being headwear; socks; functional underwear; face mask being headwear; sweaters; waistcoats; jackets; sweat shirts; sweat jackets; tracksuit bottoms as clothing; shorts; baseball caps; baselayer tops; baselayer bottoms; neckerchiefs; bandanas; gloves; trousers | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising, marketing and promotion services; business assistance, management and administrative services; online retail store services featuring clothing; promotion of goods and services through sponsorship of sports events; wholesale store services featuring sporting equipment; retail store services featuring sporting equipment; retail store services featuring sporting goods; wholesale store services featuring sporting goods; wholesale store services featuring footwear; retail store services featuring footwear; retail store services featuring headwear; wholesale store services featuring headwear; mail order services featuring clothing; wholesale store services featuring clothing; retail store services featuring clothing; retail store services featuring bags; wholesale store services featuring bags | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Franziska Schrednitzki
- Other trademarks owned by BIEHLER Sportswear GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by BIEHLER Sportswear GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Sascha Winkler
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named BIEHLER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2026 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 27, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 27, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 6, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 12, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 24, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 23, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |