USPTO serial 79318270
BIOVIVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELL, JUSTIN T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 304- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIOVIVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | News and information agencies; radio, telegraph, telephone communications services as well as video communications services; transmission of messages by teletypewriter, transmission of messages, telegrams; dissemination of information, of radio or television programs by all means; data communication and teleprocessing services; services provided by a data communications server center; communication services by means of interactive videography terminals accessible via access codes especially in the context of entertainment, education, surveys, television shows and games or in connection therewith | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Teaching services; information relating to education; publishing and lending musical works and audiovisual works; lending and publication of books; entertainment; production and performance of shows; radio or television entertainment; editing of radio and television programs; production and projection of motion-picture films; rental of cinematographic films, phonographic or videographic recordings, cinematographic film projection apparatus, and show scenery; movie studio services; recording studio services; organization of competitions with respect to education, sports competitions, or entertainment; arranging and conducting symposiums, seminars, conferences and congresses; organization of exhibitions for cultural or educational purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 24, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 24, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 13, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 12, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |