USPTO serial 79318454
OOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Game software; interactive video game programs; computer programs for computer games and video games | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment; providing interactive computer games online; information relating to computer games for entertainment purposes provided online from a computer database or a global communication network; provision of computer games online; providing interactive multi-player computer games via the Internet and electronic communication networks; computer games service accessible on the network by the users; entertainment services via computer games and video games; electronic game services provided via the Internet; electronic game services provided by means of a global communication network; providing a computer game that may be accessed by users via a global computer network and/or the Internet; game services via computer systems; online video-game services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Video game software design; design and development of software for video games; consultancy with respect to the design and development of computer programs; information technology consultancy; development of video games software; video game software programming; computer programming for video games and computer games; development of video games | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 11, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 10, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |