USPTO serial 79318615
LIFINEO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIFINEO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software; electronic equipment for data processing; electronic equipment intended for processing and securing computer and digital data; downloadable computer applications (software); computer software and databases that can be consulted via access code for information storage, transmission and dissemination; computer software and databases for carrying out information transactions; software | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Communications via computer terminals; transmission of information by telematic means, transmission of information accessible by access code, via computer data processing servers, via computer or telematic networks including the Internet and the World Wide Web; provision of access to computer databases or to telecommunication, computer or telematic networks; provision of access to databases; transmission of texts, electronic documents, databases, computer databases and audiovisual information | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Development (design), development, programming, installation, maintenance, updating or rental of software; computer programming; computer system analysis; computer system design; conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; conducting of technical project studies; services provided by consultants relating to computer hardware design and development; services provided by consultants relating to Internet security; services provided by consultants relating to data security; information technology (IT) consultancy; information technology consultancy services; telecommunication technology consultancy services; monitoring of computer systems for the detection of unauthorized access or data protection breaches; remote monitoring of computer systems; development of computer software applications, computer data storage; computer support services (programming and installation of software); technical auditing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2024 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 18, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 13, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 12, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |