USPTO serial 79318803
POWER BY CONTACT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, BRIDGET ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POWER BY CONTACT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas R. Wolf
Douglas R. Wolf Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.600 Atlantic AvenueBoston, MA 02210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DC input power supplies; stabilized voltage power supplies; power supplies for smartphones; electronic power supplies; regulated power supply apparatus, namely, power supplies; electric power apparatus, namely, power supplies; power supply control apparatus, namely, power controllers; apparatus for charging electric accumulators, namely, battery chargers; chargers for electric batteries; charging stations for electric vehicles; load cells, namely, fuel cells, wet cells, solar cells; chargers, namely, battery chargers, wireless chargers; cellular telephone battery chargers for vehicles; battery chargers for motor vehicles; battery chargers for cellular telephones; battery chargers; battery chargers for use with telephones; battery chargers for electronic cigarettes; solar battery chargers; cell phone battery chargers and battery chargers; chargers for electric storage batteries; chargers for rechargeable apparatus, namely, mobile phones, electric shavers; chargers for electronic goods for smokers, namely, electronic cigarettes; chargers for electronic cigarettes; chargers for joysticks; chargers for smartphones; chargers for vaporizers; wireless chargers; mains chargers, namely, chargers for batteries, mobile phones; USB chargers for mobile phones, joysticks; USB chargers for electronic cigarettes; power connectors; electric charge controllers; electric power supply devices; electric-current supply devices, namely, batteries; charge indicators; overload indicators; uninterruptible electrical power sources, namely, power supplies; checking and monitoring apparatus and instruments, namely, monitoring devices for monitoring battery performing characteristics ; integrated circuit cards in the nature of blank smart cards; apparatus and instruments for conducting, switching, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling electricity, namely, electric conductors, electric transformers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical evaluations concerning design, namely, engineering services; scientific research; technical research in the field of technologies; software design; software development; research and development of new products for third parties; conducting of technical project studies, namely, conducting technical research in the field of technologies related to batteries and electronic devices power monitoring; software installation; maintenance of software; updating of software; software rental; programming for computers; computer system analysis; computer system design; services provided by consultants relating to computer hardware design and development; software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for wireless recharge and electronic devices power monitoring; styling, namely, industrial design; energy auditing; electronic data storage | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2025 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 23, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 23, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 10, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 10, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 2, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jul 18, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 19, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 18, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |