USPTO serial 79318995
C-ART MUSEUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with C-ART MUSEUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lauren K. Tagarao
Lauren K. Tagarao Renner, Otto, Boisselle & Sklar, LLP1621 Euclid Ave, 19th FloorCleveland, OH 44115UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Art exhibitions; Providing information relating to the organizing of educational, cultural, sporting, or entertainment exhibitions, namely, providing information relating to art exhibitions; organisation of art exhibitions for cultural or educational purposes; rental of artwork; providing facilities for art exhibitions, namely, provision of facilities for artists' studios and exhibits; arranging, conducting and organization of lectures, seminars and workshops in the field of art, history, crafts, and manufacturing; providing facilities for lectures, seminars and workshops, namely, providing facilities for educational conventions; consultancy and information services relating to art exhibitions for educational, cultural, or entertainment purposes; educational consultancy, namely, consulting services about education; educational and instruction services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, conferences, workshops and instruction relating to arts and providing information about education and instruction relating thereto; providing facilities for exhibiting or presenting cultural or historical materials, works, photographs or reports, namely, provision of facilities for artists' studios and exhibits, providing facilities for educational conventions, providing museum facilities; arranging, conducting and organization of events for cultural exchanges between Japan and other countries; Organization of exhibitions for cultural or educational purposes, namely, material exhibitions relating to real objects, copied specimens, models, documents, diagrams, photographs, films and record discs; organization or management of live shows, namely, presentation of live show performances; arranging and planning of movies, shows, plays or musical performances and providing information relating thereto; movie theatre presentations in the nature of movie showing and movie film production and distribution; providing entertainment information relating to movie theatre presentations and movie film production and distribution; organization of entertainment and cultural events excluding movies, shows, plays, musical performances, sports, horse races, bicycle races, boat races and auto races | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 6, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 3, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 28, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 13, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 12, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |