USPTO serial 79319073
SAMPAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OSGOOD, KRYSTINA E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SAMPAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic devices, namely, computer hardware, smart cards containing data and' or programming and smart card readers used for biometric recognition and/or for capturing, verifying and authenticating biometric data to secure communication and control access for use in financial, security, retail, transport and vending applications; biometric readers; security devices in this class, namely, smart cards containing data and/or programming and smart and biometric readers used for biometric recognition and/ or for capturing, verifying and authenticating biometric data to secure communications and control access for use in financial, security, retail, transport and vending applications, encoded electronic chip cards containing programming used to secure communications and control access to physical areas, computers, computer networks, and electronic devices and systems for use in financial, security, retail, transport and vending applications; computer software related to the foregoing application, namely, programs for capturing, verifying and authenticating biometric data and storage of biometric data; computer hardware in the nature of smart cards containing proximity payment devices known as transponders; card readers for magnetically encoded cards; radio frequency identification devices and cards containing an integrated circuit chip; telecommunication equipment, namely, transponders; computer hardware and computer and computer hardware and computer software for use in the financial services, banking, payment and telecommunications industries; computer security software; computer operating system for financial transactions on computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 8, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 8, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 17, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 16, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |