USPTO serial 79319429
MYCELIUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CIANCI, RYAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MYCELIUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Application software; computer software; computer software packages; computer software products; computer software programs; cryptocurrency exchange software; data processing software; computer hardware | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Computerised financial services; financial services; carbon trading services; trading of emission reduction credits; trading in futures; trading in options; capital fund investment; capital fund management; capital investment; investment analysis; investment fund management; issuance of tokens of value; cryptocurrency investment consultancy; venture capital financing; venture capital fund management; venture capital management | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer software design; computer software development; design of computer software; development of computer software; development of software; hosting of software as a service (saas); information technology (it) services (computer hardware, software and peripherals design and technical consultancy); online provision of web-based software (non-downloadable); provision of online non-downloadable software (application service provider); software as a service (saas); software creation; cryptocurrency engineering; agricultural research services; conducting of agricultural surveys; research relating to agriculture | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 22, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 22, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 10, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 10, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 23, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |