USPTO serial 79319516
FUSION TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FALK, JONATHAN ROBERT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FUSION TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Apparatus for irradiating the human body for medical purposes; massage apparatus, hydrojet massage apparatus, dry-water hydro massage apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Tanning apparatus, including tanning booths (solariums), sunbeds, tanning beds, vertical tanning apparatus; facial tanning apparatus, LED facial tanning apparatus, UV-LED facial tanning apparatus with reflector systems, whole body tanning apparatus, human body irradiating apparatus and UV-ray irradiation apparatus; tanning booths (solariums), sunbeds, tanning beds, vertical tanning apparatus, LED facial tanning apparatus, UV-LED facial tanning apparatus with reflector systems, whole body tanning apparatus, human body irradiating apparatus and UV-ray irradiation apparatus for cosmetic use; lamps and tubes used for tanning apparatus, sunbeds, tanning beds, vertical tanning apparatus, facial tanning apparatus, full-body tanning apparatus, human body irradiation apparatus and UV ray irradiation apparatus; UV lamps and UV tubes; low pressure fluorescent lamps, high pressure discharge lamps, light-emitting diodes [LED] and LED devices, all for use in skin tanning apparatus, sun beds, tanning beds, vertical tanning apparatus, facial tanning apparatus, apparatus for tanning the whole body, human body irradiating apparatus and UV radiation apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising for body and facial tanning using light technologies used in tanning booths (solariums) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 25, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 25, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 26, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 25, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 25, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 9, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 8, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |