USPTO serial 79320054
PINMIRROR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORNWELL, ANDREA B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PINMIRROR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Optical glass; optical sensors; virtual reality glasses; optical mirrors; reflectors for microscopes; optical apparatus and instruments, except for glasses and photographic apparatus; optical lenses; micro projector; image projectors; cameras; eyeglasses; spectacle lenses; parts for spectacles; frames for spectacles; spectacle holders; virtual reality goggles; apparatus for reproducing image; electronic imaging devices; smartglasses; smartphones; eyewear type smart phone; wearable computers; display for smart phones; virtual reality headsets; virtual reality software; augmented reality software; computer software; digital signal processors; wearable video display monitors; wearable computer peripherals; distance sensors; range finders; range finders for golf; viewfinders for cameras | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design of optical components; design of optical and microoptical components; optical research laboratory services; optical research laboratory services; design and development of virtual reality software; data mining; development of hardware for digital signal processing; design and development of multimedia products; development of hardware for audio and video operators; design of hardware for audio and video operators; application service provider (ASP); image processing software design; design and development of image processing software; computer hardware design; development of computer peripherals; computer programming; cloud computing; research of new products for others; technological research; research relating to physics; industrial technology research; research and development of electronic components; product development | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 20, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 20, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 18, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 2, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 1, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |