USPTO serial 79320266
OPYPRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHOOR, AMIT KUMAR
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OPYPRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (saas); platform as a service (paas); backend as a service (baas); database as a service (daas); hosting of software as a service (saas); application service provider services; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software applications through a website or through downloadable mobile software applications (apps); provision of online computer software (non-downloadable); providing and hosting software as a service (saas) and platform as a service (paas) related to financial, payment and monetary services including buy now pay later (bnpl) financial services and other forms of credit; providing on-line non-downloadable software, software as a service (saas) and platform as a service (paas) for processing online and electronic payments, for facilitating financial transactions, for creating and administering customer accounts, for facilitating retailers to manage trade accounts for customers, and for facilitating payments for goods and services using credit accounts; design and development of computer hardware and software; provision of information relating to all of the foregoing services via printed materials and reports, publications and directories; information, consultancy and advisory services relating to all the aforesaid services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 1, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 1, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2023 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 1, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 1, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 7, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 6, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |