Drawing for SOMPTUEUX

USPTO serial 79321016

SOMPTUEUX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CIANCI, RYAN MICHAEL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOMPTUEUX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANGEL ROMAN CAMPOS

ANGEL ROMAN CAMPOS MUNCY, GEISSLER, OLDS & LOWE, P.C.125 S. ROYAL ST.ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics; non-medicated soaps; hair shampoos; toilet bowl detergents other than for use in manufacturing operations and for medical purposes; dentifrices; perfume and fragrances for personal use; breath freshening preparations for personal hygiene; false nails; false eyelashes; adhesives for false eyelashesACTIVE—
021Cosmetic and toilet utensils, namely, electric toothbrushes and makeup brushes, combs; hair brushes, sponges used for applying make-up, make-up brushes, eyebrow brushes, lip brushes, nail brushes, powder compacts sold empty, powder puffs, soap boxes, perfume sprayers sold empty; dental floss; industrial packaging glass containers for cosmetics, sold empty; make-up removing appliances; incense burners; soap dispensersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 8, 2025FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 20, 2025FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 20, 2025FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 19, 2024MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 19, 2024MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 27, 2023ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 27, 2023EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 16, 2023EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 26, 2023GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2023GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2023CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 3, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 3, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2023ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 3, 2023EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 3, 2023JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 3, 2023EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 20, 2023OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 1, 2023OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 1, 2023OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2023GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 1, 2023GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 1, 2023CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 13, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 2023ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 16, 2022NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 16, 2022ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 15, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 15, 2022PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2022PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 24, 2022RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 5, 2022RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 5, 2022RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 30, 2022RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 29, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 2021MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 29, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2021REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance