USPTO serial 79321869
NSIDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHOOR, AMIT KUMAR
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NSIDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software and applications for mobile devices; packaged software; software for diagnostics and troubleshooting; network operating system programs; interactive computer software; computer software applications, downloadable; computer groupware; computer firewall software; integrated software packages; computer software, recorded | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Publication of books relating to information technology; provision of training courses; provision of education courses; arranging of workshops and seminars; provision of courses of instruction in the management of information technology; conducting courses, seminars and workshops; conducting of classes; conducting of courses relating to business management; conducting instructional courses; conducting of educational courses | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design, development, maintenance and updating of computer software; design, installation, updating and maintenance of computer software; rental of computer programs; computer software technical support services; software development in the framework of software publishing; development of computer software; software engineering; software engineering services for data processing programs; providing information in the field of computer software design; consultancy in the field of computer software design; software as a service [SaaS]; data security consultancy; installation of computer programs; installation, maintenance and repair of software for computer systems; hosting computer sites [web sites]; server hosting; research in the field of information technology; providing information relating to computer programs; rental of data processing programs; development, programming and rental of data processing programs; computer programming; design and development of computer software; information technology [IT] consultancy; creating and designing website-based indexes of information for others [information technology services]; computer software design; consultancy services relating to the design, development and use of computer hardware and software; internet security consultancy | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Licensing [legal services] in the framework of software publishing; licensing of computer software [legal services] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 27, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 10, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 11, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 10, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |