USPTO serial 79321959
FINOVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIBAUDO, MICHELLE RACHEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FINOVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software; computer software; banking software; financial management software; computer programmes relating to financial matters; computer software relating to the handling of financial transactions; workflow software; workflow management system software; office and business applications; business technology software | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Rental of financial management software; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for analyzing financial data and generating reports; design of information systems relating to finance; software installation; updating of software databases; hosting services, software as a service, and rental of software; software as a service [SaaS] services; software as a service [SaaS] featuring software platforms for banking and financial management; providing online, non-downloadable software; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software; providing online non-downloadable software for banking and financial management; providing temporary use of non-downloadable business software; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for the management of information; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for the management of data; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for the transmission of information; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for the transmission of data; installation, maintenance, repair and servicing of computer software; software development; software design; consultancy in the field of office and workplace automation; information technology consultancy; information technology [IT] engineering; outsource service providers in the field of information technology; computer and information technology consultancy services; information, advisory and consultancy in respect of the aforementioned services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 21, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 21, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 5, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 4, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |