USPTO serial 79322332
GRO ZONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GRO ZONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRANDI G BRENNER
BRANDI G BRENNER LEVY & GRANDINETTIPO BOX 18385WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Greenhouse frames made of metal; arches of metal for supporting plants, namely, arbors of metal for supporting plants; garden shelf frame units of metal for supporting plants; garden box frame units of metal for supporting plants; low tunnels of metal for the protection of plants, namely, elongate tunnels of common metal for placement over growing plants to protect them from harmful environmental factors; covers of metal for the protection of plants, namely, metal canopies; metal wire cloches for protecting plants; metal trellis; metal trellis for supporting plants; horticultural cold frames of metal | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | Non-metal greenhouse frames; arches made of non-metallic materials for supporting plants, namely, arbors made of wood for supporting plants; garden shelf frame units of wood for supporting plants; garden box frame units of wood for supporting plants; low tunnels of non-metallic materials for the protection of plants, namely, elongated tunnels of wood and plastic materials for placement over growing plants to protect them from harmful environmental factors; covers for the protection of plants, namely, wood canopies; non-metal trellis; non-metal trellis for supporting plants; horticultural cold frames of non-metallic materials | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2023 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 5, 2023 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 27, 2023 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2023 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 7, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2023 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 19, 2023 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2023 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Oct 20, 2022 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2022 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 15, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 27, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 26, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |