USPTO serial 79323405
RAID VALLEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CIANCI, RYAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RAID VALLEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Magnetic data media; data processing equipment; computer game and video game hardware and software; software for playing video, computer and on-line games; computer gaming software; interactive multimedia software programs; software for enabling video, computer and on-line games to be run on multiple platforms; downloadable software for developing, designing, modifying and customising video, computer and on-line games; application software for televisions; electronic publications (downloadable) provided on-line from databases for the internet; games software; video and audio games; computer software containing music and motion picture music, animated films or all other media; application software; downloadable application software for smart phones; downloadable applications for use with mobile devices; software and applications for mobile devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Leisure activities and entertainment; entertainment provided via the internet; gambling services; electronic games services; game services provided online from a computer network; online game services through mobile devices; games services provided via computer networks and global communication networks; providing games by cellular telephone communication; providing games by or for use on cellular telephones; providing interactive multi-player computer games via the internet and electronic communication networks; on-line game services; provision of on-line computer games; entertainment services provided by on-line streams; providing on-line information in the field of computer gaming entertainment; providing electronic publications on-line (not downloadable); production of film, television and radio programmes; film and television entertainment; publication of computer games; electronic games services, including provision of computer games on-line or by means of a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 8, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |