Drawing for SCIO AUTOMATION

USPTO serial 79323491

SCIO AUTOMATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAGLIARDI, JEANINE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCIO AUTOMATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alexandra Summers

Alexandra Summers Sausser Summers, PC4846 Payton StreetSanta Barbara, CA 93111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines for use in assembly, namely, machines for assembling automotive and industrial modules for the automation of assembly and testing of industrial goods; Industrial robots; Belts for conveyors; Custom machines for the automation of work processes in the nature of industrial robotsACTIVE—
009Electrical switch cabinets in the nature of cabinets specially adapted for electrical switches; Apparatus and instruments for conducting the distribution or use of electricity; Apparatus, instruments and cables for electricity, namely, electric wire and cableACTIVE—
012Autonomous vehicles for internal transport, namely, automated lift trucks, trains for transporting liquid, solid, and semi-solid materials for industrial purposes, forklift trucksACTIVE—
037Repair or maintenance of electronic machines and apparatus; Maintenance of data processing apparatus; Maintenance and repair of data communications networks' hardware; Installation of electronic and digital connection to a call centre; Installation of electrical apparatus or generators; Installation of electric and electronic equipment in automobiles; Electric appliance installation and repairACTIVE—
042Engineering design and consultancy; Planning and design of retail premises; Construction drafting; New product design services; Building inspection services in the nature of surveying; Architectural planning servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 6, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 1, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 3, 2025CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 31, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 17, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 15, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 12, 2023OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 22, 2023OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 22, 2023OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 30, 2022GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2022GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2022CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 8, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 7, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 13, 2022RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 24, 2022RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2022RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 14, 2022RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 13, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 2021MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 25, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2021REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance