USPTO serial 79323739
WISEGUARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MUNN LEWIS, LAKEISHA S
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WISEGUARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARIUS J. JASON
4955 SHANKLAND RDWILLOUGHBY, OH 44094-5636UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for use in the field of global regulatory requirements and compliance; platform as a service (PaaS) featuring software for use in the field of global regulatory requirements and compliance; consultancy and information services relating to software rental; computer software consultancy; Information technology consulting; consulting services in the field of software as a service (SaaS); technical consultancy relating to the application and use of computer software; technical consultancy relating to the installation and maintenance of computer software; consultancy and providing information in the field of information technology architecture and infrastructure; consultancy and providing information in the field of computer system integration; technical consultancy services relating to information technology; technical advisory services relating to data processing software | ABANDONED | — |
| 045 | Legal advice; legal support services; legal compliance auditing; regulatory compliance auditing; reviewing standards and practices to assure compliance with data protection, security, corporate and joint venture laws and regulations; legal services for preparation of regulations; legal information services; consultancy relating to computer software licensing; expert consultancy relating to legal issues; information, advisory and consultancy services relating to legal matters; legal document preparation services; legal information research services; legal research; litigation consultancy; litigation services; litigation support services; mediation in legal procedures; preparation of legal reports; provision of expert legal opinions, namely, expert legal commentary services in legal matters | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2022 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 20, 2022 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 20, 2022 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 20, 2022 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 20, 2022 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 20, 2022 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 10, 2022 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2022 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 19, 2022 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2022 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Sep 15, 2022 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 12, 2022 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2022 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Sep 9, 2022 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 23, 2022 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 3, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2022 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 15, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 25, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |