USPTO serial 79323805
BEEMAX GUMMY BOOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BEEMAX GUMMY BOOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Coffee; cocoa; coffee- and cocoa-based beverages; chocolate-based beverages; pasta; flour-based stuffed dumplings; noodles; pastries and bakery products based on flour; bakery desserts based on flour and chocolate; bread; simit being a Turkish ring-shaped bagel covered with sesame seeds; pogaça being a Turkish bagel; pita; sandwiches; katmer being a Turkish pastry; pies; cakes; baklava; kadayif being a Turkish bakery dessert based on dough; bakery desserts based on dough coated with syrup; puddings; custard; kazandibi being a Turkish dessert pudding; rice pudding; keskül being Turkish rice pudding; honey; bee glue being propolis for human consumption; propolis for food purposes; savory sauces used as condiments for foodstuff; vanilla flavoring for culinary purposes; spices; sauces being condiments; tomato sauce; yeast; baking powder; flour; processed semolina; starch for food; sugar; cube sugar; powdered sugar; tea; iced tea; confectionery made of sugar; chocolate; biscuits; crackers; wafer-shaped chewing gums; ice-cream; edible ices; salt; cereal-based snack food; popcorn; crushed oats; corn chips; breakfast cereals; processed wheat for human consumption; crushed barley for human consumption; processed oats for human consumption; processed rye for human consumption; rice; molasses for food | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 15, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 15, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 5, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 4, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |