USPTO serial 79323843
THE VANSHEE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MESSICK, TABITHA LEE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE VANSHEE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer game software via a global computer network and wireless devices; recorded computer game programs; downloadable game software for mobile phones; recorded game software for mobile phones; video game cartridges and cassettes; video games software; interactive multimedia computer game programs; downloadable game programs provided online from a computer network or mobile phone network; computer game software for use on mobile and cellular phones; computer game cartridges; electronic media featuring computer game program | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing game images and voices via home video game consoles; provision of video and audio content via home video consoles for entertainment purposes; providing music entertainment via video game machines for household use; provision of information relating to game services; distribution of game software; provision of information relating to electronic games services; electronic games services provided by means of a global communication network; providing non-downloadable games on the Internet; mobile game center services; arranging and conducting of mobile game competitions; online game services accessible via downloadable mobile applications; electronic online gaming services accessible via mobile game applications (apps); online game services provided via mobile applications; providing amusement facilities; operation of amusement facilities; planning, operating, and arranging of online game competitions and other game competitions; providing of game contents via online; electronic games services provided by means of the internet; game services provided online from a computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 10, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 10, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 15, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |