USPTO serial 79323861
END STOP CONTROL VALVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYS, CANDACE W
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with END STOP CONTROL VALVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robbie R. Harmer
Robbie R. Harmer thyssenkrupp North America, LLC9450 SW Gemini Dr., Ste. 28424Beaverton, OR 97008UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | shock absorbers for motor vehicles; hydraulic units for motor vehicles as shock-absorbing and/or stabilising elements for chassis and chassis structures of motor vehicles; vibration dampers for wheel suspensions of motor vehicles and their attachments; suspension struts for vehicles; suspension struts for vehicles, in particular air suspension struts; combined spring/damper modules for vehicles; Mc-Pherson suspension struts for land vehicles; suspension struts with steel springs or air springs for wheel suspensions of motor vehicles; gas pressure shock absorbers, namely, hydropneumatic shock absorbers for motor vehicles; support bearings for motor vehicle vibration dampers; springs for wheel suspensions of motor vehicles, in particular helical compression springs, air springs, individually standing air springs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by thyssenkrupp Bilstein GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by thyssenkrupp Bilstein GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by thyssenkrupp AG
- Other trademarks owned by thyssenkrupp Bilstein GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named END STOP CONTROL VALVE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2026 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2026 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2024 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 12, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 14, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 16, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 18, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 5, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 4, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |