USPTO serial 79324266
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laurence P. Colton
Laurence P. Colton SMITH TEMPEL BLAHA LLC1600 Parkwood Circle SE, Suite 620Atlanta, GA 30339UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Reusable capsules that are fillable and refillable, sold empty, for extractable substances and brewing beverages for use with electric coffee machines; reusable capsules that are fillable and refillable, sold empty, for extractable substances and for brewing beverages, namely, coffee capsules, tea capsules, and cocoa capsules for use with electric coffee machines; reusable coffee capsules, tea capsules, cocoa capsules, sold empty, for use with electric coffee machines; the foregoing goods each biodegradable and made from renewable raw materials | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Empty capsules, not made of metal, for production of brewed beverages; empty capsules, not made of metal, for production of brewed beverages, such as coffee, tea, cocoa; empty coffee capsules, empty tea capsules, empty cocoa capsules, each not made of metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa and substitutes therefor; capsules filled with extractable substances, namely, filled with coffee, tea, cocoa; capsules filled with extractable substances, namely, filled with coffee, tea, cocoa for brewing; filled coffee capsules, filled tea capsules, filled cocoa capsules; the foregoing goods contained in biodegradable capsules and capsules made from renewable raw materials | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 25, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 18, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 18, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 18, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 22, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 17, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 24, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 23, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |