Drawing for SOCO INNOVATION

USPTO serial 79324498

SOCO INNOVATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NEAL, KELLY L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SOCO INNOVATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Omar F. Darwich

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Electric vehicles, namely, motorcycle; motors, electric, for land vehicles; motorcycles; motorcycle wheel axis holder; mopeds; electric bicycle; electric tricycles not being toys; saddle covers for bicycles; vehicle seatsACTIVE—
035business management consultancy; personnel management consultancy; secretarial services; accounting servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 21, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2024CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 19, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2024FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 4, 2024FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 31, 2024FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 30, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 30, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 30, 2023ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 19, 2023OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 29, 2023OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 29, 2023OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 12, 2022RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 10, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 10, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 10, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 5, 2022RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 12, 2022RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 12, 2022RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 23, 2022RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 22, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 10, 2021MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 6, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2021REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance