Drawing for MODULAR MULTI PROCESS

USPTO serial 79324683

MODULAR MULTI PROCESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RIEPEL, CHRISTINA MAXINE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 600: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MODULAR MULTI PROCESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Handelsman

Jeffrey H. Handelsman Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.1950 Roland Clarke PlaceReston, VA 20191-1411UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Metalworking machines and machine tools, and structural and replacement parts thereforACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 19, 2024FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 2, 2024FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2024FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2023MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Oct 1, 2023MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Oct 1, 2023ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Apr 24, 2023OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 5, 2023OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 5, 2023OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 16, 2023RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Mar 16, 2023RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2023RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Mar 2, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2023ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2023GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 4, 2023GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 4, 2023CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 23, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 22, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 22, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2022ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Dec 22, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 22, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2022COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2022RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 28, 2022RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 28, 2022RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 15, 2022RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 14, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 9, 2021MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 5, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 4, 2021REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance