USPTO serial 79324934
D. DOTS PLATFORM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAHMOUDI, MARIAM AZIZ
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with D. DOTS PLATFORM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Benjamin Folkinshteyn
Benjamin Folkinshteyn Woltz & Folkinshteyn, PC32 West LaneStamford, CT 06905UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electric installations for the remote control of industrial operations; downloadable e-wallets, namely, downloadable computer software for use as an electronic wallet; recorded computer software; recorded computer programs; recorded computer operating programs; downloadable computer software application; downloadable computer software platforms, all of the foregoing in the field of food ordering and delivery management services and q - commerce - none of the aforesaid goods relating to entertainment, entertainment software, gaming, computer games or video games | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Recovery of computer data; off-site data backup; duplication of computer programs; electronic data storage; providing information relating to computer technology, namely, software applications for food ordering and delivery management services and q-commerce via a website; installation of computer software; information technology services provided on an outsourcing basis, namely, outsource service provider in the field of information technology; computer programming; conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; conversion of computer programs and data, other than physical conversion; information technology consultancy; computer software consultancy; website design consultancy; maintenance of computer software; updating of computer software; platform as a service (PaaS) featuring platforms for use in developing and maintaining software applications for food ordering and delivery management services and q-commerce; user authentication services using technology for e-commerce transactions; user authentication services using single sign-on technology for online software applications; hosting computer web sites; software as a service (SaaS) featuring platforms for use in developing and maintaining software applications for food ordering and delivery management services and q-commerce; rental of computer software in the field of food ordering and delivery management services and q-commerce; development of computer platforms, namely, developing and maintaining software applications for food ordering and delivery management services and q-commerce; software development in the framework of software publishing; creating and maintaining websites for others; creating and designing website-based indexes of information for others; server hosting, all of the foregoing in the field of food ordering and delivery management services and q - commerce - none of the aforesaid services relating to entertainment, entertainment software, gaming, computer games or video games | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 19, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 18, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 17, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 17, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 24, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2024 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Jan 8, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 25, 2023 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 24, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 24, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 13, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 24, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 15, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 14, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |