USPTO serial 79325038
BPF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANCA, ALBERTO I
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BPF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals used in industry, including chemicals for use in the food, cosmetics, pharmaceutical, medical, chemical, polymers and technical industries; biobased chemicals; chemical additives for use in the manufacture of food products; chemicals and semi-finished chemical products for preserving foodstuffs; natural preservatives, including organic acids and salts thereof including lactic acid, lactates, sodium lactate, potassium lactate, buffered lactic acid, propionic acid, propionates, acetic acid and acetates, and mixtures of the aforesaid substances; all aforesaid natural preservatives particularly being for use in the preservation of foodstuffs | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Education; providing of training; teaching; courses; workshops; seminars; aforesaid services in particular in the field of biobased chemicals as well as in the field of development of processes for the manufacture of biobased chemicals | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services, and research and design relating thereto; industrial analysis and research services; research and development of new products (for third parties); chemical research; aforesaid services in particular in the field of biobased chemicals as well as in the field of development of processes for the manufacture of biobased chemicals | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2023 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2023 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 23, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 16, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 15, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |