USPTO serial 79325187
SIBA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AVENT, TEAGUE A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SIBA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Emily M. Chilson
Emily M. Chilson Andrus Intellectual Property Law, LLP790 North Water StreetSuite 2200Milwaukee, WI 53202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising, marketing and promotional services in the field of safety fuses; retail and wholesale store services in the field of apparatus for electricity, instruments and cables for electricity, electric and electronic components, namely, safety fuses; retail and wholesale store services in the field of electric switching apparatus for energy supply and distribution in the low and medium voltage range, other than measuring, regulating, inspecting and control apparatus; retail and wholesale store services featuring electrical fuses, electric safety switches, fuse holders, alarm signaling transmitters, alarm sensors, alarm and warning equipment, testing installations for safety fuses, testing and quality control apparatus for safety fuses, electrical testing instruments for safety fuses; retail and wholesale store services featuring parts, components and accessories for all the aforesaid goods, namely, fuse bases, fuse holders, push-on caps, microswitches, signaling units and/or fuse-like accessories, including test equipment and/or setting aids and/or isolated blades, short locking systems, fuse handles and/or personal protective equipment (PPE) for fuses, in particular, NH handles with leather cuffs | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Science and technology services, namely, design and development of safety fuses; engineering services in relation to safety fuses; analysis and testing services relating to electrical engineering apparatus for the analysis and testing of safety fuses; electrical engineering services in relation to safety fuses; engineering consultancy services in relation to electrical services concerning safety fuses; testing, authentication and quality control for others in relation to safety fuses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 18, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 16, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 9, 2024 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 15, 2023 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Jun 13, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 1, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2023 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 28, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 9, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 24, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 23, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2022 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 5, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 4, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 11, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |