Drawing for VACS

USPTO serial 79325432

VACS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VACS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kevin H. Vanderleeden

Kevin H. Vanderleeden Grogan, Tuccillo & Vanderleeden, LLP1350 Main StreetSuite 508Springfield, MA 01103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Heart pacemakers; medical apparatus for monitoring vital signs, blood pressure, heart rate; medical electrodes and cathetersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 8, 2026CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 2, 2024FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 16, 2024FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2024FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 12, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 16, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 16, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 16, 2023ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 1, 2023OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 12, 2023OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 12, 2023OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2022RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 20, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 7, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 7, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 28, 2022RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 6, 2022RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 6, 2022RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 30, 2022RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 29, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 19, 2021MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 15, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 11, 2021REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance