Drawing for ROK DESIGNED AND ENGINEERED IN LONDON · KITCHEN TOOLS · 2002

USPTO serial 79326080

ROK DESIGNED AND ENGINEERED IN LONDON · KITCHEN TOOLS · 2002

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DAVIS, MARC STEPHEN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ROK DESIGNED AND ENGINEERED IN LONDON · KITCHEN TOOLS · 2002?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electric kitchen machines and electric kitchen tools; electromechanical machines for preparing beverages; coffee extracting machines; coffee grinders, other than hand-operated; coffee mills [other than hand operated]; electric coffee grinders; power-operated coffee grindersACTIVE—
011Automatic installations for making coffee; coffee bean roasting machines; coffee brewers (electric-); coffee filters, electric; coffee machines, electric; coffee percolators, electric; coffee roasters; coffee roasting machines; coffee roasting ovens; domestic coffee percolators [electric]; electric coffee filters; electric coffee makers; electric coffee making machines; electric coffee percolators; electric coffee pots; electric coffee roasters; all these products with the exception of products for bathroomsACTIVE—
021Household or kitchen utensils and containers; hand-operated coffee-making apparatus and devices; parts and fittings for coffee-making apparatus; cups and mugs; crockery; coffee brewers (non-electric-); coffee cups; coffee filters, non-electric; coffee grinders; coffee grinders, hand-operated; coffee mills (hand operated-); coffee percolators, non-electric; coffee pots; coffee services of ceramic; coffee services of china; coffee services [tableware]; coffee stirrers; coffeepots, non-electric; hand-operated coffee grinders; non-electric coffee percolators; non-electric coffee pots; non-electric plunger style coffee makers; non-electrical coffee grinders; all these products with the exception of products for bathroomsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 3, 2023FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 11, 2023FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 11, 2023FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 9, 2023OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 19, 2023OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 19, 2023OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 12, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 11, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 11, 2022ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 22, 2022RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 28, 2022RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 28, 2022RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 29, 2022RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 28, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 23, 2021MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 19, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2021REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance