USPTO serial 79326156
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert P. Felber, Jr.
Robert P. Felber, Jr. Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis, LLP511 Union StreetSuite 2700Nashville, TN 37219| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Dummies for babies made in whole or in significant part of rubber derived from the hevea tree; feeding bottle teats made in whole or in significant part of rubber derived from the hevea tree; teething rings made in whole or in significant part of rubber derived from the hevea tree; feeding bottles made in whole or in significant part of rubber derived from the hevea tree; straps and holders for dummies for babies made in whole or in significant part of rubber derived from the hevea tree; bags of textile for storage of dummies for babies; condoms made in whole or in significant part of rubber derived from the hevea tree; menstrual cups made in whole or in significant part of rubber derived from the hevea tree | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 027 | Bath mats made in whole or in significant part of rubber derived from the hevea tree | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 028 | playthings and toys made in whole or in significant part of rubber derived from the hevea tree, namely, soccer balls, rolling balls for playing football, handball, basketball, tennis, squash, floorball, or volleyball, teethers, soothing toys in the nature of bendable toys and rubber toys for use by babies growing teeth; animal shaped molded plastic figurines, bath toys in the form of animal shaped figurines, pull toy, and stacking toys; toys made in whole or in significant part of rubber and wood derived from the hevea tree, namely, teethers, balls, bath tub toys , swimming toys, pet toys; bathing toys made in whole or in significant part of rubber derived from the hevea tree; toy ducks, fish, frogs and other toy animals for playing in the bath tub made in whole or in significant part of rubber derived from the hevea tree; playthings for rubbing the gums made in whole or in significant part of rubber derived from the hevea tree, namely, soccer balls, rolling balls, teethers, soothing toys in the nature of teethers, animals shaped molded plastic figurines, bath tub toys in the form of animal shaped figurines, pull toys, and stacking toys, and baby rattles incorporating teething rings; toy balls made in whole or in significant part of rubber derived from the hevea tree, namely, soccer balls, basket balls, foot balls, baseballs and tennis balls; swimming fins made in whole or in significant part of rubber derived from the hevea tree; toy balloons made in whole or in significant part of rubber derived from the hevea tree; pet toys made in whole or in significant part of rubber derived from the hevea tree; toy prams made in whole or in significant part of rubber derived from the hevea tree | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2023 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2023 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 5, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 31, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 1, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 19, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 18, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2022 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 16, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 15, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |