USPTO serial 79326308
SWIMM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EISNACH, MICHAEL PATRICK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SWIMM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Technological tool for developing continuous integration software; technological tool for developing continuous delivery software; automated computer software that builds up research and development knowledge; automated computer software that maintains research and development knowledge by integrating continuous documentation into the development lifecycle; computer software that creates code-coupled content such as documents, walkthroughs and guides while keeping them up to date with auto-sync | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technological services, namely, development of computer software products that solve research and development knowledge maintenance problems for engineering teams; platform-as-a-service (PAAS), infrastructure-as-a-service (IAAS) and computer software-as-a-service (SAAS) services featuring an automated platform that maintains research and development knowledge by integrating continuous documentation into the development lifecycle; platform-as-a-service (PAAS), infrastructure-as-a-service (IAAS) and computer software-as-a-service (SAAS) services featuring a platform that creates code-coupled content such as documents, walkthroughs and guides while keeping them up to date with auto-sync algorithm; platform-as-a-service (PAAS), infrastructure-as-a-service (IAAS) and computer software-as-a-service (SAAS) services featuring continuous integration and continuous delivery | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2024 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 2, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 8, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 8, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 22, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 26, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 26, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 23, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |