USPTO serial 79326426
GSB GOLD STANDARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHAEFER, REBECCA ANN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GSB GOLD STANDARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Recorded content; software; mobile apps; application software; downloadable software; downloadable computer software for blockchain technology; cloud server software | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial, monetary and banking services; valuation services; financial transactions via blockchain; finance services; computerised financial services | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services; computer communication and internet access; providing access to telecommunication networks; providing user access to platforms on the internet; providing access to platforms on the internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software creation; computer software consultancy; software development; software engineering; certification of data via blockchain; data storage via blockchain; blockchain as a service [BaaS]; cloud computing; cloud hosting provider services; cloud-based data protection services; IT programming services; information technology [IT] consultancy services; scientific and technological services; scientific and technology services; software development, programming and implementation; hosting services, software as a service, and rental of software; IT consultancy, advisory and information services; IT security services in the nature of protection and recovery of computer data; data security consultancy; internet security consultancy; design and development of electronic database software; IT project management; troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware and software problems; technical research; hosting platforms on the internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 11, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 11, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 15, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |