USPTO serial 79326477
GARRISON SACS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BETTS, MARCYA N
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GARRISON SACS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; computer firmware; computer software; computer software for content sanitisation; computer hardware, firmware, and software for content sanitisation; computer hardware, firmware, and software for computer and network security; computer hardware, firmware and software for digital security; computer hardware, firmware and software for preventing security threats on computer systems; computer hardware, firmware and software for preventing computer viruses, rootkits, advanced persistent threats, malware, and malicious attacks; computer hardware, firmware and software for preventing malicious attacks on computers, computer systems and digital devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of computer hardware, firmware and software; design of hardware, firmware and software for internet security and access solutions, namely, the design and development of technology for content sanitisation; design and development of electronic data security systems; computer security services, namely, the sanitisation of content from untrusted networks; maintenance and updating of computer hardware, firmware and software relating to computer and network security and prevention of computer risks (term considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); cloud computing featuring software for use in computer and network security; software as a service (SaaS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for content sanitisation; cloud computing services in the field of computer and network security, namely, design and development of technology for content sanitisation; computer services, namely, cloud hosting provider services; updating and maintaining cloud-based computer software through on-line updates, enhancements, and patches; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for content sanitisation; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for computer and network security; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for digital security; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for preventing security threats on computer systems; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for minimising security threats, namely, providing a platform for hardware-based content sanitisation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 29, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 8, 2022 | CRSN | CORRECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2022 | CRCR | CORRECTION CREATED FOR IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 26, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 25, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |