USPTO serial 79326562
HELENE CURTIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 774
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KNIEF, MITCHELL IRVIN
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HELENE CURTIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRIAN MATTHEW KOIDE
BRIAN MATTHEW KOIDE MILLEN WHITE ZELANO & BRANIGAN PC2200 CLARENDON BLVD, SUITE 1400ARLINGTON, VA 22201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bar soap, perfumed soaps; perfumery products; essential oils; Cosmetics; hair lotions; dentifrices; shampoos; talcum powder; toilet water; cosmetic bath preparations; toilet water containing oil for toilet purposes; sunscreen products, namely, sunscreen preparations; cotton buds for cosmetic purposes; toilet milks; tissues impregnated with cosmetic lotions; Toilet milk, for personal cleansing purposes; bath salts not for medical use; eau de Cologne; oils for cosmetic use; almond milk for cosmetic use; cotton wadding for cosmetic use; pomades for cosmetic use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2026 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2025 | CTDD | CT DECISION: DISMISSED | — |
| Jun 24, 2025 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 16, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2023 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 1, 2023 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2023 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Feb 21, 2023 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2023 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 25, 2023 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2022 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 17, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 28, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 13, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 24, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 16, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 15, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2021 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |