Drawing for PULLCAT

USPTO serial 79326784

PULLCAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BECKER, JOSEPH RAPHAEL
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PULLCAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Transplanting machines and implements, namely, vegetable transplanting machines and implements, crop transplanting machines and implements, using seedling nursery containers of paper; transplanting machines and implements, namely, vegetable transplanting machines and implements, crop transplanting machines and implements, using seedling nursery containers with continuous paper pipe and tube assembly; agricultural seed planting machines for seedling nursery containers of paperSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 12, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 11, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 3, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 3, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 3, 2023ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 13, 2022RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 16, 2022RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 15, 2022RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 11, 2022RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 10, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 14, 2021MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 8, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2021LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 25, 2021REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance