Drawing for NOBLE

USPTO serial 79327167

NOBLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEASER, ANDREW C
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with NOBLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alexander J.A. Garcia

Alexander J.A. Garcia Holland & Hart LLPP.O. Box 8749TRADEMARK DOCKETINGDenver, CO 80201-8749

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages with the exception of beers; wines; wines from the Champagne region of France made in accordance with certain, specific, or adopted standardsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 28, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2024FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 20, 2024FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 20, 2024FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 22, 2023OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 19, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 19, 2023ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 3, 2023OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 3, 2023OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 5, 2022GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 5, 2022GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 5, 2022CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 4, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 3, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 25, 2022RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 3, 2022RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 3, 2022RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 20, 2022RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 19, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 7, 2021MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 3, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2021REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance