Drawing for SHAFT

USPTO serial 79327254

SHAFT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RIEPEL, CHRISTINA MAXINE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHAFT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANGEL MIGUEL MUNOZ, ESQ.

ANGEL MIGUEL MUNOZ, ESQ. MUNOZ-LOPEZ & ASSOCIATES PLLC305 BROADWAYSUITE 704NEW YORK, NY 10007

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Protective helmets; protective helmets for sports, motorcycling, cycling, skating, bicycle motocross, and go-karting; anti-glare visors for helmets; protective face masks being protective sports helmet accessories; signaling helmets being reflective safety helmets; gloves for protection against accidentsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 12, 2023OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 12, 2023OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Feb 27, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 7, 2023RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 19, 2023OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 11, 2023OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2023OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Oct 4, 2022ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2022GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 13, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2022OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 7, 2022OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 24, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 4, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 22, 2022RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 2, 2022RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 2, 2022RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 2, 2022RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 1, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 7, 2021MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 3, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2021REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance