Drawing for HYGEA

USPTO serial 79327469

HYGEA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FICKES, JERI J
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HYGEA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANDREW T. RISSLER

ANDREW T. RISSLER PATEL & ALMEIDA, P.C.16830 VENTURA BLVD., SUITE 360ENCINO, CA 91436UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Surgical apparatus and instruments; stents; probes for medical purposes; syringes for medical purposes; cases fitted for medical instrumentsABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2025FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 27, 2025FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 27, 2025FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 27, 2024MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
Nov 27, 2024ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Nov 27, 2024OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Nov 27, 2024OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
May 22, 2023OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
May 3, 2023OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 3, 2023OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 21, 2022RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 2, 2022OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Oct 28, 2022OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB
Oct 28, 2022OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED
Oct 27, 2022OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB
Sep 27, 2022GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 27, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Sep 27, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2022OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Sep 7, 2022OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 7, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Aug 23, 2022RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 23, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 22, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 21, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 21, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 29, 2022RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jul 29, 2022RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jul 8, 2022RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jul 7, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 10, 2021MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Dec 6, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 2, 2021REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance