Drawing for METH

USPTO serial 79327472

METH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGH, TEJBIR
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with METH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kiranjit K Dharsan

Kiranjit K Dharsan Seiter Legal Studio2450 Colorado Ave., Suite 100ESanta Monica, CA 90404UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals used in industry, in particular catalysts, catalyst carriers and absorbentsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 18, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 27, 2024FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 4, 2024FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 4, 2024FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 3, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 3, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 3, 2023ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 29, 2023OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 3, 2023OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 3, 2023OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 5, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2022RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 6, 2022RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2022RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 5, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 4, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 24, 2022FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 26, 2022RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 25, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 14, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 19, 2021OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 10, 2021MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 6, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2021SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance