USPTO serial 79327987
OPENBISHENG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GANESH, HARINI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 130 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OPENBISHENG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, recorded; computer operating programs, recorded; central processing units (processors); data processing apparatus; computer hardware; liquid crystal displays (LCD); humanoid robots with artificial intelligence; computers; tablet computers; laptop computers; human face recognition devices; pedometers; smartphones; network communication apparatus; television apparatus; earphones; headphones; camcorders; cabinets for loudspeakers; electronic chips; video screens | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Platform as a service [PaaS]; technological research; quality inspection; quality system certification; installation of computer software; computer programming; computer software design; updating of computer software; consultancy in the design and development of computer hardware; recovery of computer data; maintenance of computer software; computer systems analysis; computer system design; duplication of computer programs; conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; data conversion of computer programs and data (not physical conversion); computer software consultancy; design of mobile phones software; updating of mobile phones software; providing information relating to computer technology and programming via a web site; research and development of computer software; cloud computing; software as a service [SaaS] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 29, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 10, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 10, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 30, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 30, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 13, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 13, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |